By Richard Reinderhoff, Freelance Consultant Strategy & Operations
A ‘financial’ strategist is a strategist first, and a financial second. For decades financials have been applying solutions to become a strategic business partner for the C-suite, from financial engineering and tax planning, to centralising (global) operations and deep analytics today. To avoid drilling deeper and still find nothing, reverse engineering the strategic role of the financial will show another route to be of value and increase the yield on IRR or profits with double digits…
If the aim of CFO’s and FD’s is to improve the decision-making process by the C-suite, meaning add value to the business, accounting and compliance aren't helping this quest. In fact, if you read the report by American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) and the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA), Joining the Dots: Decision Making for a New Era, you’ll be in shock:
It is all about information, yet more details or more of the same data will give you the same answers, only in more detail or at a higher spend (Capex). The trick is to reverse the direction the financial is looking: from ‘stargazing into a black hole’ to ‘storytelling based on facts’. For this to happen, the strategy of the business needs to be placed into the ‘accounting’ systems.
A simplified example will be used to show, how this ‘street smart’ solution was encountered (step 1) and how it is set-up (step 2).
A strategy is often a group of plans, where the numbers disappear in PowerPoint presentations, Excel sheets or BI software. Many financials are hooked by their screens, yet the story in the plans is ‘lost in translation’.
For example, what does the following overview tell you?
Not much, it just shows you the composition of spend, not the strategic intent. As a board member, you might even be tempted to reduce Consultancy fees and Temps, as part of a company-wide ‘savings initiative’ as a response to market pressures.
The first step to increasing your understanding is to talk to Sales & Operations and ask what drives and blocks their business. For the same example, the “Accounts” have been decomposed and reshuffled into the “Business Drivers”, it shows how each business is planning to be developed.
When result are lagging, which question will you ask now?
Of course, as a board member, you will ask where and why performance is lagging. This is how the quality of the decision is increased, avoiding ‘one size fits all’ solutions. And normally, it’s the financials that should have provided the CEO, CFO or GM with the right answer.
As a financial, you have talked to Sales & Operation (managers, directors, and global VP’s) and they have given you a jointly agreed list of key “business drivers” for each market. This list should match their business plans or strategy. One problem, there are no such descriptions in the Chart of Accounts or as Cost Centres. Here enters project accounting.
What is a project? Basically, it is a sequential flow of various tasks. Each project task can contain any kind of spend, following the Chart of Accounts, and different ‘Cost Centres’ can book on a project activity, when working (or purchasing) together.
Within project management, each project task or activity is called a Work-Breakdown-Structure (WBS), with a WBS-description and WBS-number. To transform project accounting into a strategy storyboard, you give each project task a WBS-description of a “business driver”, and have a term which lasts e.g. 20 years or more. Now the strategy is in the accounting system!
The only instruction you have to give to the budget owners is that their assistant books each transaction and allocation with one additional code: the WBS-number, which is given by the budget owner and related to one of the business drivers.
Now that you have the strategy translated into a storyboard in your accounting system and amount are being booked, this is what you get:
Project accounting has more reporting advantages, e.g. it ‘overwrites’ / no cross-border limits, bookings can be split between different WBS-numbers, and various consolidation hierarchies possible.
How does this increase the yield with double digits? Re-allocation of Capital!
A company using a traditional business planning method will learn quickly. After management sees where the money really went into and noticing they spent less time understanding the numbers, they will start to permanently reduce spend on non-value added activities and fund only the best new opportunities.
Those companies familiar with Beyond Budgeting, Driver-Based Planning, or (strategic) Zero-Based Budgeting, will immediately see the real advantages:
The increase in returns comes from the effective execution of the strategy and adapting it in accordance with the business environment. By linking the strategy with accounting, and not the other way around(!), project accounting is writing the real success story, every month!
Independent on the accounting, ERP or BI system installed, using project accounting can turbocharge any financial into a strategic business partner without the need for any significant investment. When FP&A is placed within this bigger picture, the link to strategic planning becomes evident. By translating the strategic intent of the company into business drivers made visible through the ‘use-of-funds’, the execution of the strategy becomes fact-based, transparent and verifiable: ‘talks & figures’. Just think about it, and add real value to your role and your company.
Copyright, ©2018 fpa-trends.com. All rights reserved.