A couple of weeks ago I joined the meeting of the Amsterdam FP&A Board where we discussed the subject of the FP&A analytical transformation. In the course of the meeting the participants mentioned their current main concerns, some of which such as Data ownership, Data quality, and Business Glossary (‘Speaking the same language’). This surprised me. Why? Because these topics are ‘hot’ topics of Data Management (DM) with no common vision on the subject.
As a result I decided to write several articles on these topics for FP&A professionals. The main purpose is to share some knowledge and practical experience and to start a discussion about these subjects.
In this article I would like to talk about the following questions: How to recognize a Data owner? and What the Data owner is accountable for?
I was deeply touched when some of participants said they considered FP&A to be the owner of all data that comes to the department. The arguments were: ‘FP&A makes reports’, ‘Nobody else wants to take responsibility’. I wonder how many of you also share this vision?
To create a common opinion on the subject, let’s explore the following questions first:
Case study: an account officer of your company closed a deal with a new customer and signed a contract. He/she provides data about the customer and the contract. First the data is input in CRM system. Then the data moves to the Financial system and DWH undergoing some processing and finally the reaches FP&A department to be used in reports.
Using Data management language, Customer and Contract data (facts represented as text, numbers, graphics, images, sound, or video) went through the data life cycle (creation, transformation, and usage) through different applications. In the process the Data has been transformed, aggregated, etc. These transformations could have taken place according to different business rules. When data got into some context (in the form of a report) it turned into Information (data within a certain context and timeframe, that have a particular meaning  ). It could happen that Data lifecycle has been embedded in different business processes and went through different departments.
What kind of Data has been involved in our Case Study? Customer data is considered to be a Master data, Contract data is usually classified as Transactional data. Business rules are also some sort of data, which usually defined as Meta-data (data about data).
So, on our journey to define Data owner we need to take into consideration several contexts:
You might become lost as there are plenty of Data-related roles described in different sources. I came across Data owners, stewards, users, providers etc. I was always curious: if I were a person who has to play several roles simultaneously, would I get a A4 paper with clear description what I have to do on a daily basis?
I think one of the reasons for such a variety of functions, is that the creators of these functions do not put them in the relevant context (like the four, that we have just identified above).
So, let’s us concentrate only on the context of Ownership and let’s us continue with the Customer and Contract data example.
We all know that it is difficult to find volunteers within your company who would say ‘I am a Data owner’. How can you prove that somebody is actually a Data owner? Years ago, while setting up Data ownership responsibilities within a company, we developed a list of questions that helped in Data ownership recognition. Some of them are presented below:
Now I am convinced that the solution is quite simple. There are two unambiguous ‘recognition’ criteria for a Data owner which are an ability and an authority to:
One small detail (where the Devil is): these rules are applicable for unchanged data. As soon as data has been transformed it might change an owner.
Let’s get back to the Case Study to get a clear picture.
Customer data (name, address, country of residence etc.) stays unchanged till it reaches FP&A department. So, if you as FP&A professional discover some mismatch or finds that the data is not fully complete, what will you do? Who will be able to verify accuracy and completeness of the data and fill in gaps? As for me only one answer is possible: The Account officer is the Data owner.
Contract data, such as e.g. the contract amount might stay unchanged till it reaches FP&A department. And it still the Account officer who might verify the accuracy of the contract amount. But let’s assume that you will need to convert the amount into another currency, decide which exchange rate to apply or aggregate the data according certain rules… What does it mean? From the moment when these data transformations take place, you, FP&A professional, become the data owner. The same rule is applied for the rules that you might apply to transform data, because these rules are also data.
I will offer some general responsibilities for your consideration, but I need to warn you that these responsibilities might vary for each company. Why? The responsibilities are dependable on the size of the organization and overlap with responsibilities of other roles that might exist (such as System owner, Business process owner etc.).
So, a Data owner is accountable (based on RACI) for:
I hope that the article provokes more questions and arguments that I would like to discuss with you. Feel free to contact FP&A Board and me if you want advice on how to apply these concepts within your company.
 DAMA Dictionary, p.66
 Accuracy is freedom from mistake or error, conformity to truth or to a standard, exactness, the degree of conformity of a measure to a standard or true value, DAMA Dictionary, p.12
 Completeness is the quality of being whole or perfect and having nothing missing, Cambridge Dictionary [http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/completeness]
Copyright, ©2018 fpa-trends.com. All rights reserved.